Source: News Bharati English05 Apr 2017 15:05:50
New Delhi, April 5: Central government on Wednesday stated that no change has been made in the Right to Information act (RTI) fee structure and restriction of words as both the factors remain same according to the key provisions of the 2012 Rules framed by UPA government. However, the present government has proposed to bring some changes to make RTI more effective and easier.
Government further clarified that the incorrect and misleading news report appeared in a section of the media about a new set of RTI Rules that have been formulated which will create difficulties and hurdles in the right of the citizens to get information. However, the government further emphasized that it is committed to ensuring a full and easy implementation of the Right to Information.
The government stated that the copy of rules which were notified on 31st July 2012 by UPA government is still available on the official website of DOPT. Importantly, the rules which were framed and notified in 2012 stated that an RTI application will ordinarily be not more than 500 words (subject to exception) with a nominal fee being charged from each applicant.
However, the legality of the CIC (Management) regulations of 2007 was challenged before the Delhi High Court and these were quashed. The matter has been pending before the Supreme Court. The Government, therefore, decided, in consultation with the CIC, that a comprehensive set of rules be notified by consolidating the key provisions of CIC (Management) Regulations and also the Rules of 2012. Same has been put up in public domain for comments.
The factual position on the proposed Rules is as follows:
1. The existing RTI Rules 2012 notified on 31st July 2012 specifically provide in section 3 that an application shall ordinarily not contain more than 500 words excluding annexure. It further provides that no application shall be rejected only on the grounds that it contains more than 500 words. There is no change proposed in these provisions in the new rules.
2. The provision with respect to charging rates is identical to that contained in existing RTI Rules 2012 which provides for charging rates as per price fixed for a publication or Rs.2 per page of photocopy for extracts from the publication. There is a further provision in rule 5 that no fee under rule 3 and rule 4 shall be charged from any person who is below the poverty line. This provision has been retained as such in the new proposed rules. Therefore, there is no change in fee and the existing rules have been proposed to be continued.
3. There is no change in the postal charges for sending the information.
4. The proposed rules do not limit the filing of either complaint or appeal “online” only. Both rule 8 and rule 13 dealing with filing of appeals and complaints especially provide for filing offline as well as online.
5. The provision for withdrawal of the appeal, which was earlier included in the Central Information Commission (Management) Regulations 2007 has been included in the new rules. Similarly, the provision for abatement of appeals/complaints on the death of the applicant/ complainant, which was earlier included in the Central Information Commission (Management) Regulations 2007, has also been included.
6. With regards to the provision of officials being allowed to file documents to counter claims of false information, it is clarified that at present, as per the procedure of CIC, once an appeal is taken cognizance of, the CPIOs are given the notice to furnish their submission before the appeal is decided. This was also part of the Central Information Commission (Management) Regulations 2007 which are now being incorporated in the rules. Therefore, the existing standard operating procedure has been proposed to be incorporated in the rules.
The government in the end said the allegation that there is a move to dilute the provisions of RTI is unfounded. The proposed amendments to the rules are in public domain for comments by April 15, 2017, and will be finalized keeping in view the public feedback received in the matter. The comments can be sent both online and in hard copy to the Department.