Bombay HC denies interim relief to Nawab Malik in money laundering case

ED"s counsels said that ED had adequate evidence & eyewitness accounts to prove that Malik had conspired to purchase the property illegally

NewsBharati    15-Mar-2022 15:31:36 PM
Total Views |
Mumbai, March 15: The Bombay High Court on Tuesday, denied any interim relief to Maharashtra cabinet minister and NCP leader Nawab Malik in a money laundering case, and refused to pass an order for his release from judicial custody.

Nawab Malik
 
Malik was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on February 23 under the PMLA over a property deal allegedly linked to the aides of fugitive gangster Dawood Ibrahim. He is currently in judicial custody.
 
 
The minister had challenged his arrest and as an interim prayer, sought that he be released from custody immediately. However, a bench of Justices PB Varale and SM Modak on Tuesday denied any such interim relief to Malik.

The bench said the minister's petition had raised some debatable issues and the court needed to hear at length the arguments from both sides before passing any final orders.

Following his arrest, Malik filed a habeas corpus plea through senior advocate Amit Desai, claiming that his arrest by ED and the consequent remands were illegal. He had sought that his arrest in the case be quashed and set aside and in the interim, he be released from custody immediately.
 
Also Read | Special court denies bail to Anil Deshmukh in money laundering case
 
The ED has accused Malik of being part of an alleged criminal conspiracy to usurp a property in Kurla area of Mumbai that currently has a market value of Rs 300 crore and belongs rightfully to one Munira Plumber.

Malik has contended that he had bought the property in a bonafide transaction three decades ago, and that Plumber has now changed her mind about the transaction.

Additional Solicitor General Anil Singha & Hiten Venegaonkar, ED's counsels, had argued that Malik was arrested following due process under the law. They said ED had adequate evidence & eyewitness accounts to prove that Malik had conspired to purchase the property illegally. ED also contended that a habeas corpus plea in the present case was not maintainable & Malik should seek bail instead.