Retired Bombay HC judge, family face threats over 2024 Dawoodi Bohra succession verdict; Bar Association condemns, exclusive details
Total Views |
Retired Bombay High Court judge Justice Gautam S. Patel and his family have reportedly faced a sustained campaign of threats, intimidation, and violence across India and the United Kingdom following his April 23, 2024 judgment in the long-running Dawoodi Bohra succession dispute.
The latest reported incident occurred on June 5, when Justice Patel’s daughter, Aditi Patel, who lives in the United Kingdom, allegedly received an anonymous letter threatening escalating violence against the family unless the retired judge publicly withdrew his judgment through a YouTube video. The letter reportedly claimed that a contract had been issued against the family and included a digital storage device. Bearing a German postal mark and a fictitious London return address, the package was handed over unopened to Hertfordshire Police due to cybersecurity concerns.
The situation escalated on April 22, 2026, when Aditi Patel was allegedly attacked by a masked assailant in London, suffering a fractured nose and other injuries. The incident is being examined by UK authorities, with the West Hertfordshire Counter Terrorism Unit reportedly reviewing the matter. Hertfordshire Constabulary has confirmed that investigations remain ongoing. Earlier, a non-cognisable complaint had also been registered in Mumbai concerning the threatening communications.
"Violence or threats of violence against judges or their families strike at the very heart of judicial independence and constitute a blatant assault on the rule of law. Such conduct is not merely an attack upon an individual Judge; it is an attack upon the institution of the judiciary and the constitutional promise that disputes will be resolved by courts free from fear, favour, affection or ill-will," it added calling upon Ministry of External Affairs to take all steps necessary and take up the matter with the authorities in England to ensure safety of Justice Patel's family.
Unable to resolve the dispute internally, Qutbuddin filed a civil suit before the Bombay High Court on March 29, 2014, seeking a declaration that he was the rightful 53rd Dai al-Mutlaq. After his death in 2016, his son Taher Fakhruddin was substituted as plaintiff and continued the proceedings. Following a trial that lasted nearly nine years, Justice Patel dismissed the suit in April 2024, concluding that the claimant had failed to establish his entitlement to the position and affirming Mufaddal Saifuddin’s status as the lawful spiritual head of the community.
Representatives of Taher Fakhruddin have strongly condemned the alleged threats and violence, asserting that such incidents are being used to discredit their faction and potentially influence the ongoing appellate proceedings. The allegations have renewed concerns about judicial independence and the security of judges and their families after retirement. Investigations in the United Kingdom continue, while the appeal against Justice Patel’s judgment remains pending before the Bombay High Court.
In that ruling, Justice Patel upheld Mufaddal Saifuddin as the lawful 53rd Dai al-Mutlaq and spiritual leader of the Dawoodi Bohra community, dismissing a suit filed by Taher Fakhruddin challenging Saifuddin’s claim to succession through the doctrine of “nass” (designation of a successor). The judgment is currently under appeal before a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court.
The latest reported incident occurred on June 5, when Justice Patel’s daughter, Aditi Patel, who lives in the United Kingdom, allegedly received an anonymous letter threatening escalating violence against the family unless the retired judge publicly withdrew his judgment through a YouTube video. The letter reportedly claimed that a contract had been issued against the family and included a digital storage device. Bearing a German postal mark and a fictitious London return address, the package was handed over unopened to Hertfordshire Police due to cybersecurity concerns.
According to reports, the communications demanded that Justice Patel issue a public statement asserting that his judgment had been delivered under coercion and circulate it to legal institutions, media organisations, and professional bodies. Justice Patel is understood to have informed the Chief Justice of India, Surya Kant, the Acting Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, and the Indian High Commission in London about the threats. The alleged intimidation campaign is said to have begun in August 2025, when threatening letters were sent to Justice Patel’s residence in Mumbai and to his daughter in London. One communication reportedly claimed responsibility for a break-in at Aditi Patel’s home in the UK.
The situation escalated on April 22, 2026, when Aditi Patel was allegedly attacked by a masked assailant in London, suffering a fractured nose and other injuries. The incident is being examined by UK authorities, with the West Hertfordshire Counter Terrorism Unit reportedly reviewing the matter. Hertfordshire Constabulary has confirmed that investigations remain ongoing. Earlier, a non-cognisable complaint had also been registered in Mumbai concerning the threatening communications.
Following this, Bombay Bar Association took cognizance of the event and condemned the attack. "The Association records its strongest condemnation of any attempt to threaten, intimidate, harass, assault or otherwise target a Judge or members of a Judge's family on account of the discharge of judicial functions. Reports that a member of Justice Patel's family suffered physical injury in the course of one of these incidents render the matter particularly disturbing and warrant the most serious attention of the authorities," the official resolution read.
"Violence or threats of violence against judges or their families strike at the very heart of judicial independence and constitute a blatant assault on the rule of law. Such conduct is not merely an attack upon an individual Judge; it is an attack upon the institution of the judiciary and the constitutional promise that disputes will be resolved by courts free from fear, favour, affection or ill-will," it added calling upon Ministry of External Affairs to take all steps necessary and take up the matter with the authorities in England to ensure safety of Justice Patel's family.
The succession dispute traces its origins to the death of Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin, the 52nd spiritual leader of the Dawoodi Bohra community. Following his death, his son Mufaddal Saifuddin assumed leadership as the 53rd Dai al-Mutlaq. However, the succession was challenged by Khuzaima Qutbuddin, Burhanuddin’s half-brother, who claimed that he had been privately designated as successor through a valid nass.
Unable to resolve the dispute internally, Qutbuddin filed a civil suit before the Bombay High Court on March 29, 2014, seeking a declaration that he was the rightful 53rd Dai al-Mutlaq. After his death in 2016, his son Taher Fakhruddin was substituted as plaintiff and continued the proceedings. Following a trial that lasted nearly nine years, Justice Patel dismissed the suit in April 2024, concluding that the claimant had failed to establish his entitlement to the position and affirming Mufaddal Saifuddin’s status as the lawful spiritual head of the community.
Representatives of Taher Fakhruddin have strongly condemned the alleged threats and violence, asserting that such incidents are being used to discredit their faction and potentially influence the ongoing appellate proceedings. The allegations have renewed concerns about judicial independence and the security of judges and their families after retirement. Investigations in the United Kingdom continue, while the appeal against Justice Patel’s judgment remains pending before the Bombay High Court.