Ramraksha or Paksharaksha?

ALSO READ: Kerala's Mar Thoma Church opens membership to transgenders in a first for Indian Churches; move revives debate over church's shifting doctrinal positions 

 

But politics is rarely divorced from timing. The announcement of this agitation comes at a moment when Shiv Sena (UBT) is struggling to reclaim the ideological space it once occupied. Since the split in the Shiv Sena and the subsequent electoral setbacks, the party has been searching for an issue that reconnects it with its traditional Hindutva support base. The "Ramraksha" campaign inevitably appears against this political backdrop.

Democracy allows every political party to evolve. There is nothing inherently wrong in revisiting ideological positions. But such evolution must appear credible and consistent. If a party invokes faith only after electoral setbacks or political isolation, scepticism becomes inevitable. Public trust cannot be rebuilt through slogans alone. It requires a demonstrable commitment that survives political convenience.

The larger concern extends beyond one party. Indian politics has frequently witnessed religion being invoked selectively. Political actors who remain silent when one faith is mocked but become vocal for appeasement politics. Conversely, some who champion religious causes fail to uphold transparency and accountability when allegations arise within institutions associated with those causes. Both tendencies weaken public confidence. Faith deserves respect, but respect for faith also demands integrity.

ALSO READ: Pak’s Bulldozer Justice: Preaching Human Rights, Demolishing Gurdwaras 

For Shiv Sena (UBT), this agitation is also an attempt to answer a deeper political question. After losing its organisational structure, election symbol and a significant section of its traditional cadre, the party has struggled to define what distinguishes it from the broader opposition. Returning to the language of Hindutva appears to be an effort to reconnect with its original ideological roots. Whether the electorate views this as genuine introspection or tactical repositioning remains to be seen.

Ultimately, the issue is not whether one supports an inquiry into alleged financial irregularities. Every responsible citizen should. The issue is whether Prabhu Ramchandra should become a recurring political instrument whenever electoral fortunes decline. Faith cannot become seasonal. It cannot be rediscovered only when political relevance is under strain.

The people of Maharashtra and indeed the country will judge this campaign not merely by its rhetoric but by its consistency. If Shiv Sena (UBT) is genuinely committed to protecting the sanctity of Prabhu Ramchandra and ensuring that devotees' contributions are safeguarded, it deserves to pursue that cause with seriousness and sincerity. But if the campaign is primarily intended to recover lost political ground, voters will recognise the difference. That is why the question refuses to go away. Is this truly Ramraksha a principled demand to protect the sanctity of faith? Or is it Paksharaksha an attempt to protect a political party searching for its lost ideological identity? In a democracy, only consistent conduct, not compelling slogans, can answer that question.

The episode also lends relevance to the recent observation of Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) Sarkaryawah Dattatreya Hosabale that Hindu society must remain vigilant against forces that seek to create divisions within it for political or ideological gain. Whatever one's political affiliation, allegations involving institutions associated with Hindu faith should not become an opportunity for vested interests to deepen internal fault lines or erode public confidence in civilisational symbols. Wrongdoing, if established, must certainly be punished, but Hindus must also recognise attempts to pit one section against another or to convert matters of faith into instruments of political polarisation.