More than two months after the videos of an Iftar gathering on the Ganga sparked outrage and a political storm in Varanasi, the Allahabad High Court on Friday (May 15)
granted bail to eight of the 14 Muslim men accused in the case.
The matter, which drew sharp reactions on social media and led to multiple serious charges being involved, was heard by single benches of Justice Jitendra Kumar Sinha and Justice Rajiv Lochan Shukla. Bail pleas of the remaining accused are still pending before the Court.
The accused include Azad Ali, Aamir Kaiki, Danish Saifi, Mohammed Ahmad, Nehal Afridi, Mahfooz Alam, Mohammed Anas, Mohammed Awwal, Mohammed Tahseem, Mohammed Ahmad alias Raja, Mohammed Noor Ismail, Mohammed Tausif Ahmad, Mohammed Faizan, and Mohammed Sameer. Earlier, a magistrate court denied them bail in February, a decision upheld by the Sessions Court. They subsequently moved the High Court for relief.
ALSO READ: Man Detained With Live Bullets at Assam CM Oath Ceremony Venue
The case came to light after videos of the group breaking their Ramadan fast on a boat in the Ganga went viral on social media. The complaint was filed by Rajat Jaiswal, city unit president of the Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha in Varanasi. He alleged that the accused hurt religious sentiments by consuming chicken biryani on the boat and throwing leftovers into the river.
Initially, police booked the accused under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including provisions related to defiling a place of worship, outraging religious feelings, promoting enmity, public nuisance, fouling a public water source, and disobeying orders issued by public authorities. Section 24 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, was also invoked.
ALSO READ: Md Ahashan, now Anil Pandit: Allahabad HC pulls ADM order rejecting voluntary conversion of Muslim to Hinduism
The police added more serious charges later. Boat owners alleged that the accused had forcibly taken the vessel, leading police to invoke Section 308(5) of the BNS, which deals with extortion through threats of death or grievous hurt. Section 67 of the Information Technology Act was also added over the alleged circulation of objectionable content online.